感觉本站的内容过于分散
不能
自己去看详细论证过程 https://2049bbs.xyz/t/1815
人少不怕,倒是乐意见到一些高质量的帖子。 以我个人来说,并不喜欢隔壁站的氛围,除了政治就是战斗,还有一些口嗨抖机灵的。。 而且又不是自己没有事情干,整天住站里的那种,一言不合就对线。 个人比较喜欢 摆事实讲道理的帖子,比如这位老哥分分析: https://2049bbs.xyz/t/1774 (猜测是同行或者近似的工作)
I think 2049bbs is not appropriate for serious beings (targeting at academic researches), reasons (including but not limited in):
-
Who’s the audience? Specialized audience should seek for specialized sites (say, arXiv subfields daily check etc.) See also “知识的诅咒” 和科普的难题
-
As an author, writing seriously takes a lot of time, time is precious.
BTW, I just want to analyze (seriously) how implementable Radical Markets can be.
radical market … 能够把贯穿近现代史两百年的两大股思潮结合在一起,是因为它发现了自由主义和马克思主义二者共同的那个立足「根本」。 而这个根本,一是上面提到的一套幂函数的逻辑,二要求很低的市场交易成本。 而区块链、加密货币的价值,就是从技术上降低了转账的交易成本。 所以作者在书中明确地提出了,比特币的出现,加密货币的诞生,能够与 radical market 相结合,可能激发出魔法般的化学反应。这本书去年被以太坊创始人 V 神读到,他发现了这一点,于是把书介绍到了区块链行业。
Apart from the section of data labor (See also), other sections seem not implementable enough, We can’t establish & dont’t need Perpetual Motion (probably except for Platonists), unless humans can be informational-ized, which is NOT dissipative, thus won’t rely on marginal analysis.
Combining blockchain is more like forging a so-called value consensus, like axioms in math, if you commit a set of certain axioms, the corresponding system is consistent (though it may not be complete), if not, you cannot be convinced … such tricks won’t work for me. See also the blow-ups of blockchain from ZhangShouCheng.
PS: I’ve been typing in English cuz Chinese input method is not installed on this machine …